<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for truststix.com Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truststix.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truststix.com/blog</link>
	<description>Patterns, Practices and Results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo+MSFT &#8211; more questions on both sides than answers by soortspuddy</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-3580</link>
		<dc:creator>soortspuddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 19:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-3580</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed reading your blogpost, keep on writing such interesting posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading your blogpost, keep on writing such interesting posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Icahn the end game for Yahoo!? by seo of india</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/05/17/is-icahn-the-end-game-for-yahoo/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>seo of india</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 16:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/05/17/is-icahn-the-end-game-for-yahoo/#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>Nice informtion. Thanks for the sharing. I would like to bookmark this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice informtion. Thanks for the sharing. I would like to bookmark this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yahoo+MSFT &#8211; more questions on both sides than answers by hupHugemump</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>hupHugemump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/11/yahoomsft-more-questions-on-both-sides-than-answers/#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MSFT+YHOO &#8211; Is this a possibility? by Shivaram Mysore</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivaram Mysore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/02/02/msftyhoo-is-this-a-possibility/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner - Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer - http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very nice blog post by NBA Dallas Mavericks Owner &#8211; Mark Cuban on why Yahoo should yes to MSFT offer &#8211; <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogmaverick.com/2008/02/03/why-yahoo-should-say-yes-to-microsoft/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Shivaram Mysore</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivaram Mysore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security:  http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This white paper is also posted on Help Net Security:  <a href="http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108" rel="nofollow">http://www.net-security.org/article.php?id=1108</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Web 2.0 Security by Ravi Char</title>
		<link>http://truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Char</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truststix.com/blog/2008/01/17/web-20-security/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Shivaram:

Congrats on your blog. 

Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area.

Information Security is all about protecting data - Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web - I look forward to read your thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shivaram:</p>
<p>Congrats on your blog. </p>
<p>Web 2.0 is a term often misunderstood and it has multiple interpretations. I commend you for addressing security issue in this area.</p>
<p>Information Security is all about protecting data &#8211; Confidentiality-Integrity- Availability. This objective of protecting data does not change with technology used to access the data. The goal is to deploy technology to access the data at the same time preserve the objective of protecting the data. In your Whitepaper you are right on, when you say usage determines the threat scenarios this is where Web 2.0 differs significantly from earlier web &#8211; I look forward to read your thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.454 seconds -->
